↜ Back to index Introduction to Numerical Analysis 1

# Lecture 6

We cover the following topics:

### Stability of the Euler method

Take the file euler.f90 from Lecture 3 and modify it to solve the ODE

\left\{ \begin{aligned} x' &= -100x + 100t + 101, && t > 0,\\ x(0) &= 1 \end{aligned} \right.

with time step $$h = 0.1$$.

• What is the exact solution?
• What numerical solution do you get?
• What is the plot of the solution?
• How about with initial data $$x(0) = 1.01$$ or $$x(0) = 0.99$$?

Now try to set the time step to $$h = 0.01$$. Does the solution improve?

Conclusion: If $$h$$ is chosen too big, the Euler method becomes unstable. See more on wikipedia. The intuitive reason is that the Euler method easily “overshoots” the solution. See the following figure for the illustration of this with the equation $$x' = - x, x(0) = 1$$.

We need to choose $$h$$ small enough to satisfy a stability condition: for the Euler method it is

$|1 + h d| < 1$

where $$d = -100$$ in this case.

## Backward Euler method

The backward Euler method is derived similarly to the Euler method, but we do the Taylor expansion at $$t + h$$ instead of $$t$$:

\begin{aligned} x(t) &= x(t + h) - h x'(t + h) + O(h^2)\\ &= x(t + h) - h f(x(t + h), t + h) + O(h^2) \end{aligned}

Therefore if we neglect the term $$O(h^2)$$, we can approximate the value $$x(t + h)$$ using the value $$x(t) + h f(x(t + h), t + h)$$. This leads by iteration to a sequence of values $$x_0, x_1, x_2, \ldots$$ with $$x_0$$ being the initial condition and the we can iteratively compute $$x_i$$ from

$$$\label{backward} x_i = x_{i - 1} + h f(x_i, i h), \qquad i = 1, 2, \ldots$$$

This is the backward Euler method. See more on wikipedia. Since $$x_i$$ is on the right-hand side, we need to solve an algebraic equation, which makes it more difficult to compute the value $$x_i$$ at each time step than in the case of the Euler method. Because of this, we call this method implicit.

The main advantage of this method is that it is unconditionally stable. That is, there is no restriction on how big $$h$$ we can take, only the global truncation error. To illustrate this, the following figure shows how the backward Euler method deals with $$x' = -x, x(0) = 1$$ that was problematic for the Euler method.

Exercise: Apply the backward Euler method to the ODE in the previous section. Since $$f(x,t) = - 100 x + 100 t + 101$$, we can easily solve the algebraic equation.

• Implement the code and find the solution with $$h = 0.1$$ and initial condition $$x(0) = 1.01$$.
• What result do you get?
• What is the order of the method?

## General right-hand side $$f(x,t)$$

In the case of a general right-hand side $$f$$, the solution $$x_i$$ in the backward Euler method $$\eqref{backward}$$ cannot be found analytically. We therefore use iterative numerical methods, such as Newton’s method:

Suppose we want to find a solution $$y$$ of the equation $$g(y) = 0$$. Given a guess $$y_0$$, we try to improve the solution by finding the intersection of the tangent line to the graph of $$g$$ at $$(y_0, g(y_0))$$ and the $$y$$ axis. This gives a new $$y_1$$:

$y_1 = y_0 - \frac{g(y_0)}{g'(y_0)}.$

Quite often $$y_1$$ is a much better approximation of the solution than $$y_0$$. We can do this iteratively, which gives the iteration formula

$$$\label{newton} y_{k+1} = y_k - \frac{g(y_k)}{g'(y_k)}, \qquad k = 0, 1, \ldots.$$$

See the following figure for an illustration.

In practice, if the initial guess is reasonable and the function $$g$$ is well-behaved, only a few iterations are necessary to obtain good accuracy.

Exercise: Implement a backward Euler method with Newton’s method for finding the new value $$x_i$$ for general $$f$$. You will need to provide the derivative $$f_x$$.

Note that in this case $$g(y) := y - h f(y, t_i) - x_{i-1}$$ since we have to find a solution $$x_i$$ of $$\eqref{backward}$$.

See backward-newton.f90 for a Fortran code using the backward Euler method with Newton’s method to solve the ODE

\left\{ \begin{aligned} x' &= \sin(x), && t > 0,\\ x(0) &= 1 \end{aligned} \right.

with $$h = 0.1$$ and $$N = 100$$. The solution should look like: